Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1910No. 1,754PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, District Judge.

This is an action in ejectment brought by defendants in error, plaintiffs below, to recover possession of a certain piece of placer mining property in Alaska, and for damages.. There is no substantial conflict in the evidence as to the material facts: On the 1st day of January, 1901, Harry M. Ball located the Navajoe placer claim, which, by the notice of location, and the recorder’s certificate, contained a tract of land 1,320 feet long and 660 feet wide, i. e., an area of just 20 acres; but, as actually marked upon the ground by the boundary stakes, there was by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Velasco v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sunburst Minerals, LLC v. Emerald Copper Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  4. United States v. DeasyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1928
  5. Cardoner v. Stanley Consol. Min. & Mill. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API