Jones v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
This is an action in ejectment brought by defendants in error, plaintiffs below, to recover possession of a certain piece of placer mining property in Alaska, and for damages.. There is no substantial conflict in the evidence as to the material facts: On the 1st day of January, 1901, Harry M. Ball located the Navajoe placer claim, which, by the notice of location, and the recorder’s certificate, contained a tract of land 1,320 feet long and 660 feet wide, i. e., an area of just 20 acres; but, as actually marked upon the ground by the boundary stakes, there was by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Velasco v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Sunburst Minerals, LLC v. Emerald Copper Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- United States v. DeasyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1928
- Cardoner v. Stanley Consol. Min. & Mill. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.