Parsons v. Heenan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY. C.
Plaintiff declared upon one express contract and recovered upon another. The contract alleged in the petition was that defendants employed plaintiff to secure a purchaser for certain oil and gas leases and the production thereon, and agreed to pay, as a commission for securing a purchaser, two and one-half per cent, of the purchase price; that he did secure a purchaser who paid defendant $1,000,000 for the property. The contract proved, and upon which recovery was had, was that if the plaintiff would put the defendants in touch with a concern that would buy, they would pay…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Platt v. JohrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Treese v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Nation v. HarnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hugill v. WeekleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kelley v. Garfield County Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Cook v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Adams v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Conaway v. BoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sweat v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.