Legal Opinion

Nation v. Harness

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 755PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. M. Bowles, Assigned Judge. Action by D. F. Plarness and T. F. Hines, partners as Harness & Hines, against William E. Nation. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Oklahoma county. Plaintiff in error, who will hereafter be denominated defendant, during the year 1906, listed his farm in Cleveland county, Okla., for sale or trade with defendants in error (plaintiffs below), a real estate firm, along with two other firms in Oklahoma City. The petition avers that plaintiffs, who were real estate agents, rendered defendant services which consisted in bringing together the defendant and one A. C. Achen-hausen, and the purchase of said defendant’s real property by the said Achenhausen was discussed, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Scully v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Duval v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Kifer v. YoderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Cook v. ForstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Eichoff v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Parsons v. HeenanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API