Legal Opinion

Sweat v. Skaggs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1929No. 19052PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

As plaintiff, L. N. Skaggs, sued Nannie Sweat and E. W. Whitney, as defendants, alleging that under a verbal contract made with them he was to operate a certain grist mill in Wewoka, Okla., which had belonged to Ed Sweat, deceased; that under the contract he was to run the mill for the customary wages paid for such services in the vicinity of the place where the mill was run, and he further pleaded that the usual and reasonable wages was the sum of $5 per day; that he had worked 115 days, and he prayed judgment against the defendants for the amount so due.

The defendants answered by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. JoinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Miller v. NannySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Smith v. Cornwell & Chowning Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Butler v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Parsons v. HeenanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. WesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Seaman v. ChesnutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hartsell v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Kelley v. Garfield County Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Buffington v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API