Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hoskins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1927No. 16572PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, C. J.

Herein is presented error for reversal from the district court of Okmulgee county. Cora Adams, formerly Coleman, sued Annetta Hoskins and Bertie De Steiguer. Judgment went for the defendants. The plaintiff’s action is for recovery of specific real property, or ejectment. Her petition alleges that she, as owner of the equitable title to half the land described, is entitled to the immediate possession thereof, as against the defendants, by reason of this state of facts, to wit: That on December 7, 1909, she was the wife of one March Coleman, who departed this life on said last-named date,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Grayson v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Doggett v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Homeland Realty Co. v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winters v. BirchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Leckie v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Sweat v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Adams v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API