Legal Opinion

Cook v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1938No. 27606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county rendered upon a verdict in favor of idaintiff below in an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The parties are here designated as they appeared at the trial.

The first and second assignments of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Defendant says the court erred in overruling his demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, and that the verdict and judgment were contrary to the law and the evidence.

The question of the sufficiency of the evidence is not here for review.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Getman-Macdonell-Summers Drug Co. v. AcostaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Kennedy v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Parsons v. HeenanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Sulzberger & Sons Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Plains Petroleum Corp. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Davis v. Town of CashionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API