Legal Opinion
Platt v. Johr
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 1894No. 1,060PublishedCited by 21 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
The appellee sued the appellant on a parol contract, and recovered of him the sum of $107 as a commission claimed to have been earned by him in introducing to the appellant a purchaser for the sale of a livery stable and its contents.
The overruling of a demurrer to the complaint is assigned as error; but as the appellant’s counsel has not seen proper to discuss the point, it must be treated as waived.
"The jury, with the general verdict, returned answers to certain interrogatories. Upon these answers the appellant moved for a judgment, notwithstanding the general verdict. The overruling of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Fischer v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Barnett v. GlutingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barney v. Yazoo Delta Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Storer v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Mullen v. BowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Thomas v. HennesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.