Treese v. Shoemaker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Payne County; John P. Hiekam, Judge. Action by Robert Shoemaker against A. L. Treese to recover broker’s commission. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPitohford, J.
The defendant in error instituted this action in the district court of Payne county against the plaintiff in error seeking to recover the sum of $320 by virtue of a contract whereby the plaintiff in error agreed to pay him that sum for procuring an oil and gas lease from one J. W. Sims. The parties hereafter will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The answer filed by the defendant was a general denial.
The record discloses that, a short time prior to the 25th of July, 1913, one Boucher, claiming to be a partner of the defendant, Treese, employed the plaintiff to secure for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Eichoff v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Yarborough v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Papoose Oil Co. v. SwindlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.