New England Investment Properties, Inc. v. Spire Realty & Development Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment rendered for the defendants1 in this action to collect a real estate broker’s commission. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly held that (1) the listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes § 20-325a (b),2 and (2) the plaintiff could *684not invoke estoppel to preclude the defendants from relying on General Statutes § 20-325a. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This appeal arises from a listing agreement between the plaintiff real estate broker and the defendants regarding real property in Enfield. In November,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Currie v. MaranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rapin v. NettletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Muros North Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In Re Capitol Hill GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Rapin v. NettletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Taylor v. Carbee, No. 551241 (Jun. 12, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.