Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rapin v. Nettleton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 6, 1998No. AC 16989Published

1ConcurrenceLaver Y, J.

I agree with the result of the majority, but I believe this court, en banc, or the Supreme Court should revisit New England Investment Properties, Inc. v. Spire Realty & Development Corp., 31 Conn. App. 682, 687-88, 626 A.2d 1316 (1993), regarding its position on the applicability of the bad faith doctrine set forth in Habetz v. Condon, 224 Conn. 231, 618 A.2d 501 (1992), involving a section of the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-429 (a),1 which is analogous to General Statutes § 20-325a (b).

I believe the following language from Habetz v. Condon, supra, 224 Conn. 239-40, applies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. New England Investment Properties, Inc. v. Spire Realty & Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API