Legal Opinion
Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Muros North Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 16, 2002No. AC 21090PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*221 Opinion
FLYNN, J.
This appeal arises from the trial court’s judgment for the defendant, rendered after a trial to the court, denying recovery of a sale commission sought by the plaintiff, a real estate brokerage corporation. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) determined that the plaintiff failed to comply with the statutory prerequisites to recovering a real estate commission, described in General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 20-325a, and (2) applied the common law of contracts. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Klein v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tolk v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. AlfaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- NRT New England, LLC v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016