Legal Opinion

Currie v. Marano

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 1, 1988No. 5627PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the plaintiff’s appeal from a defendants’ judgment in an action, tried to the court, for a real estate commission. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in concluding (1) that a real estate broker who earns a commission pursuant to an agreement that complies with General Statutes § 20-325a1 *528must in addition demonstrate that the written agreement complies with General Statutes § 20-325b, 2 (2) that the statements of the named defendant did not constitute a judicial admission that the real estate commission at issue was due, (3) that the defendants were not equitably estopped…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Huntley v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Peacock Realty Co. v. E. Thomas Crandall Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Location Realty, Inc. v. ColaccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API