Currie v. Marano
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is the plaintiff’s appeal from a defendants’ judgment in an action, tried to the court, for a real estate commission. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in concluding (1) that a real estate broker who earns a commission pursuant to an agreement that complies with General Statutes § 20-325a1 *528must in addition demonstrate that the written agreement complies with General Statutes § 20-325b, 2 (2) that the statements of the named defendant did not constitute a judicial admission that the real estate commission at issue was due, (3) that the defendants were not equitably estopped…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Huntley v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Peacock Realty Co. v. E. Thomas Crandall Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Location Realty, Inc. v. ColaccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.