Legal Opinion

Paddack v. McDonald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1983No. TC 223493, CA A24973, SC 29121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*669JONES, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit for an examination of defendant’s payroll records and for recovery of any unpaid fringe benefit contributions found due as a result of the payroll examination, pursuant to the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 USC § 141, et seq., and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 USC § 1001, et seq., as amended.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, pursuant to ORCP 21,1 for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Defendant contended the complaint did not contain an allegation that at the time the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Meadowbrook v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Masse v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  4. Paddack v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API