Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Mitchell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage. On trial, to avoid a failure of proof of the allegations of their complaint, as pleaded, plaintiffs moved for leave to file an amended complaint. The trial court denied that motion, but with leave for plaintiffs to move for a dismissal without prejudice, so as to permit plaintiffs to refile a new complaint. That motion was then made by plaintiffs and allowed.

Before the entry of the written decree, defendant moved for allowance of attorney fees. Plaintiffs also apparently discovered that they might have difficulty in obtaining service of a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. ChamberlainOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Callanan v. Sun Lakes Homeowners' Ass'n 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Survivors of Iida v. Oriental Imports, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Portland Trading Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API