Legal Opinion

Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Portland Trading Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1981No. TC A7807-11307, CA 13127, SC 27070PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

The issue before us concerns the propriety of an award by the Court of Appeals of attorney fees to a successful appellant in that court. The issue arose as follows:

Portland Trading Co. sold a division of its business to Western Garment Associates, Inc. The sales agreement contained this clause:

"Section 5.2 Indemnification. Western agrees to indemnify Trading from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees both at trial and on appeal) or disbursements of any kind or nature…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sackett v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Principal Life Ins. Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Holmes v. Oregon Ass'n of Credit Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Meadowbrook v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Springer v. Bowen, Lee & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Osburn v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API