Legal Opinion

Farris v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1975PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action in their capacity as insureds in a liability policy issued by defendant (USF & Gr). The action is in part to recover plaintiffs’ expenses incurred in defending an action brought against them and which USF & Gr refused to defend. The trial court sustained the demurrer of USF & Gl- and plaintiffs appeal.

The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal contending plaintiffs are attempting to appeal from a nonappealable order. We denied the motion; however, we granted the defendant leave to renew.

The trial court sustained the demurrer upon the ground that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Casey v. Northwestern Security Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hoover v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Pub. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API