Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. Duke

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 20, 1993No. 1911968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application For Rehearing

The opinion released on March 26, 1993, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted.

The plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for five co-employee defendants in a personal injury action filed pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11(c)(2).1 The judgment for the five co-employee defendants was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P., and this appeal followed. We affirm.

The following summary of essential facts is taken from the trial court's "Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment":

"Plaintiff William C. Hallmark was a general mechanic for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lipham v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Namislo v. Akzo Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Bates v. RileyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  4. Cumbie v. L&A Contracting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Owens v. RadoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API