Legal Opinion

Harris v. Gill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1991No. 1900519PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael L. Harris appeals from the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Nelson Gill and K.D. Moore in this action to recover damages for personal injury to Harris. This action was brought under Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11 (part of the Alabama Workmen's Compensation Act). We reverse and remand.

The summary judgment was proper in this case if there was no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P. The burden was on the defendants to make a prima facie showing that no genuine issue of material fact existed and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Tiger Motor Company v. WinslettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Ford v. MitchamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Borders v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Layne v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Fowler v. Jenkins (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Ford v. Carylon Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API