Namislo v. Akzo Chemical Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Mary Namislo and her husband, Ricky Namislo, appeal from summary judgments entered in favor of Stauffer Chemical Company, Inc., and Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc., on her claims alleging negligence and wantonness; in favor of several co-employee defendants on her claims of "willful conduct" as defined in § 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala. Code 1975; in favor of co-employee defendants on her claims alleging the tort of outrage; in favor of co-employee Fred Cannon, Akzo Chemical Company, Inc., Stauffer, and Chesebrough-Ponds on her claims of intentional fraud; and in favor of Akzo, Stauffer, and co-employee…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Treadwell v. Dow-United TechnologiesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc. v. BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Cumbie v. L&A Contracting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Moore v. WelchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009