Legal Opinion

Namislo v. Akzo Chemical Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 3, 1995No. 1940308PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary Namislo and her husband, Ricky Namislo, appeal from summary judgments entered in favor of Stauffer Chemical Company, Inc., and Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc., on her claims alleging negligence and wantonness; in favor of several co-employee defendants on her claims of "willful conduct" as defined in § 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala. Code 1975; in favor of co-employee defendants on her claims alleging the tort of outrage; in favor of co-employee Fred Cannon, Akzo Chemical Company, Inc., Stauffer, and Chesebrough-Ponds on her claims of intentional fraud; and in favor of Akzo, Stauffer, and co-employee…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Treadwell v. Dow-United TechnologiesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  3. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc. v. BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Cumbie v. L&A Contracting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Moore v. WelchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API