Reed v. Brunson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Plaintiffs, John Kenneth Reed and his wife, Rene Reed,1 appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendants, Ed Brunson, Sherman Howell, Jim Babbington, Bill Perkins, and Gerald Phillips (hereinafter sometimes referred to as co-employees), in this action to recover damages based on personal injury. We affirm.
After examining the materials submitted to the trial court, including numerous exhibits and the depositions of the plaintiff and co-employees,…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- White v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.