Legal Opinion

Moore v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 16, 1991No. 1900914PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alfred Charles Moore appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, Benjamin Reeves, Robert Patterson, Geno D'Andrade, and James Patterson. We reverse and remand.

The summary judgment was proper in this case if there was no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P. The burden was on the defendants to make a prima facie showing that no genuine issue of material fact existed and that they were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. If that showing was made, then the burden shifted to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bailey v. HoggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Riley v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Tiger Motor Company v. WinslettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Layne v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Raines v. Browning-Ferris IndustriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Fowler v. Jenkins (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte ByromSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Blackwood v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API