Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hogg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-1187PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a co-employee action regarding failure to install a safety guard. Willie and Annie Bailey brought an action against Hooper Concrete, Inc., James Hogg, and Rufus Mitchell, alleging that Willie was injured in an on-the-job accident due to willful and wanton conduct on the part of the defendants.1 Hogg filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The judgment in favor of Hogg was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., and the Baileys appeal.

Hooper, which manufactures concrete, purchased a used concrete plant from another concrete manufacturer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Landers v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Layne v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Williams v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API