Bailey v. Hogg
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from a co-employee action regarding failure to install a safety guard. Willie and Annie Bailey brought an action against Hooper Concrete, Inc., James Hogg, and Rufus Mitchell, alleging that Willie was injured in an on-the-job accident due to willful and wanton conduct on the part of the defendants.1 Hogg filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The judgment in favor of Hogg was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., and the Baileys appeal.
Hooper, which manufactures concrete, purchased a used concrete plant from another concrete manufacturer…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by38 opinions
- Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Landers v. O'Neal Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Layne v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Williams v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.