Legal Opinion
Wade v. Padberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 1955No. 36505PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.
This appeal is from an order of jhe trial court overruling a motion to vacate a judgment entered on default, and the only question presented is whether the trial court erred in overruling such motion.
On July 28, 1953, Hugh Wade, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, filed an action in replevin against Ida Padberg and E. H. Gregg, hereinafter referred to as defendants. Summons and writ of replevin were ■duly issued and served and the sheriff took possession of eight of the thirteen items of ■■ personal property involved, being unable to locate the other five items.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Halliburton v. Illinois Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Shuler v. VigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Morrell v. MorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. KellumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beck v. JarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Girkin v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Washington Mutual Bank FA v. Farhat Enterprises, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Boehs v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Green v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975