Legal Opinion

Halliburton v. Illinois Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1935No. 25471PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is the second time this case has been presented to this court. On the first occasion the plaintiffs in error attempted to prevent the court of common pleas of Tulsa county from vacating a judgment previously rendered in that court-. They sought a writ of prohibition in an original action filed herein. Relief was denied for the reason that an adequate remedy by appeal was available in the event an order vacating the judgment and granting a new trial should be entered in the court below. See Halliburton et al. v. Williams, Judge, 166 Okla. 248, 27 P. (2d) 360.

Subsequent to the decision in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Halliburton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Mott v. . Union Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Savoy Oil Co. v. EmerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. H. C. Behrens Lumber Co. v. LagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Midkiff v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Corliss v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Weaver Construction Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Haskell v. CutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API