Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Kellum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1953No. 35618PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

Herein it was shown that the defendant, after summons, acted with some diligence, and in full purpose to contest the plaintiff’s claim, but became in default in the action solely at the fault and neglect of the defendant’s attorneys and/or their employees, though in view of the organization of the work of representation of defendant in the firm of attorneys there are extenuating or excusing circumstances in this case; and, that, with promptness after the entry of the default judgment, the defendant filed motion to vacate the judgment, and therewith tendered an answer stating a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halliburton v. Illinois Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Cox v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Latson v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Wade v. PadbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Boehs v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API