Legal Opinion

Beck v. Jarrett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1961No. 39047PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

E. M. Jarrett, defendant in error, commenced this action in September, 1957,. against the plaintiffs in error, to recover possession of a certain promissory note in, the amount of $10,000, and $500 damages for alleged malicious and wrongful acts in retaining said note. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.

The pleadings and the testimony developed that after filing several motions defendants answered in March, 1958; that in 1958 defendants and their second attorney were ready for trial and the case was continued at plaintiff’s request because he could not procure the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shuler v. VigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hodges v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Fowler v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Wade v. PadbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boston v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Singleton v. LePakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Mitchell v. MeachumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Feely v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. COLCLAZIER & ASSOCIATES v. StephensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API