Legal Opinion

Boehs v. Manning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1957No. 37317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLILE, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court of Major County overruling a motion to vacate a default judgment against Pete Boehs, a defendant. The defendant in error, F. S. Manning, commenced the action against Don Bair and Pete Boehs to recover damages for the alleged destruction of growing crops. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff alleges in his petition that he owned and resided on a quarter section of land in Major County, and that the defendant, Pete Boehs, owned an adjoining quarter section of land lying immediately…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Montague v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Morgan v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Tulsa Exchange Co. v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Home Finance Corp. v. PonderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API