Legal Opinion

Shuler v. Viger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1924No. 14038PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, 0.

The plaintiff in error, Isaac Shuler-, was the defendant in the trial court, and the defendants in error, F. G. Viger and 0. D. Hughes, were the plaintiffs, and will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Th!e plaintiffs alleged in their petition ■that on and prior to August 4, 1919, thei defendant, Isaac Shuler, was the owner of a certain string of standard tools for the drilling of oil wells, and that acting by and •through his authorized agent, T. A. Simpson. he .agreed orally with the plaintiffs that if the plaintiffs would sell the tools for the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nash v. TreatMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Hodges v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LobaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Burroughs v. Bob Martin CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Midkiff v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Beck v. JarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Haskell v. CutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API