Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Mulea
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 3, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap*754peal Board, filed March 18, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a deli counter clerk for approximately five months. He was terminated after he failed to comply with his supervisor’s instructions to perform certain tasks and directed racial slurs at the supervisor. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of SandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of MercurioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of CaraballoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of Reyna-BautistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Claim of MusacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of AmaranteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Sarson (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of OakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.