Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mercurio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 26, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed for approximately 15 months as the general marketing and sales manager of a television station in the City of Rochester, Monroe County. During this employment, he was admonished to alter his rude and disrespectful conduct toward his coworkers and clients. After it came to light that claimant had repeatedly aired certain commercial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PuenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. MacFarland v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of SchembriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MuleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of LazarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Matter of Stowits (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API