Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Caraballo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 12, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, who worked in the employer’s shipping and receiving department, was discharged for disqualifying misconduct. According to the record, claimant became annoyed when his supervisor informed him that he had neglected to pack a box that was to be picked up by a customer. Claimant responded by uttering an obscenity and stating, “I don’t care.” When the employer’s operations manager, having witnessed this confrontation, asked claimant to repeat his statement, claimant did so, adding that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of StagnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of PuenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. MacFarland v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re the Claim of RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MuleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of RokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API