Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Amarante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 21, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision ruling that claimant, a senior technician, was discharged from his employment due to disqualifying misconduct—specifically, being disruptive and insubordinate in the workplace. Claimant’s supervisor testified that he assigned claimant a particular task with a deadline and received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MuleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of LazarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re the Claim of GillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API