Legal Opinion
In re Claim of Musac
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision ruling that claimant, a jeweler, was discharged from his employment due to disqualifying misconduct—namely, being disruptive and insubordinate in the workplace. The employer testified that while discussing with claimant his failure to accommodate a customer who had been admitted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of SegarraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of AttaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of MuleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of Reyna-BautistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of CameronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AugusteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of MorarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of HeppehamerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of TeixeiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010