Legal Opinion

State v. Amundson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 2013No. A12-2095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s application of MinmStat. § 590.04, subd. 3, which permits summary dismissal of second or successive petitions for similar postconviction relief on behalf of the same petitioner, to his motion for correction of sentence under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9. Appellant also asserts that because the sentencing court imposed an upward departure based solely on a plea agreement, this court must remand to the district court with instructions to correct his 2005 sentence for aiding an offender to be concurrent with his 2002 sentence…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orozco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. ProvostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State v. Ge HerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Calvin Boswell, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API