State v. Givens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This is a sentencing appeal by the state which addresses two issues: whether there exist appropriate aggravating factors to support a durational departure in sentencing and whether a criminal defendant may waive the right to be sentenced under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. 1 We hold that suffi- eient aggravating factors exist to support the upward departure and further, that a criminal defendant may knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his right to be sentenced under the guidelines.
The facts of the crime at issue are uncontested. Respondent entered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In re the Personal Restraint of BreedloveWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.