State v. Ge Her
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Appellant, who was convicted of violating predatory-offender registration requirements, challenges the imposition of a statutorily mandated ten-year conditional-release term for risk-level-III offenders. He argues that an offender’s risk level at the time of the violation is a fact that increases the statutory-maximum sentence, and therefore, pursuant to Apprendi and Blakely, must be determined by a jury, not the judge. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Ge Her was required to register as a predatory offender following convictions of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, conspiracy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Ge HerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015