Orozco v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
This appeal is from a district court order that denied appellant’s motion to correct his sentence under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9. The district court construed appellant’s motion as a petition for postconviction relief and denied it as time-barred. We affirm.
FACTS
In June 2000, appellant Oscar Adrian Orozco shot and killed J.A. Respondent State of Minnesota charged appellant with second-degrée intentional murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.19, subd. 1(1) (1998), and second-degree unintentional murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.19, subd. 2(1) (1998).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Powers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Steven David Pawliszko v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014