Legal Opinion

State v. Misquadace

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 2002No. C4-01-81PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Respondent Keith Edward Misquadace was charged with multiple crimes and entered a plea to four offenses in exchange for the state’s agreement to a total combined sentence of 266 months, which represented three upward disposi-tional departures and three upward dura-tional departures. On the sentences for three of the offenses, the district court departed from the guidelines sentence “pursuant to the plea agreement” without stating any other reason for the departures. On appeal, Misquadace argued that the departures on two of these sentences were not authorized under…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API