Legal Opinion
State v. Maurstad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 14, 2007No. A04-1000PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Daniel Maurstad received a 129-month sentence after pleading guilty to three offenses under a plea agreement. When Maurstad negotiated the plea agreement, both he and the state assumed he would have a two-point criminal history score, which would yield a 110-month presumptive sentence. But the presentence investigation identified a prior felony conviction and corresponding probationary sentence that the parties had not taken into account. The district court then assigned two additional criminal history points — one point for the prior felony conviction and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. BeecroftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- United States v. VargasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.