City Street Improvement Co. v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing a lien for an assessment levied for certain street work in the city of St. Helena under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911. The complaint alleges, in due form, the performance of all things required by the Improvement Act to be done up to the signing of the contract on the seventh day of November, 1912. It alleges the execution of the contract, but does not .contain any statement as to what time was therein fixed by the superintendent of streets for the beginning of the work or the completion thereof, other than the general allegation…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
- Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. HadsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Tibbits Pacific Co. v. FirthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Gallagher v. J. W. Wright & Sons Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.