Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. J. W. Wright & Sons Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1927No. Docket No. 6006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

T his action is one to foreclose a public contract street improvement lien under San Francisco Street Improvement Ordinance of 1918. The contract was entered into under date of October 20, 1923. It provided that the work should be done within ninety days. This time expired January 18, 1924. On January 9, 1924, prior to the expiration of the time within which the work was to be completed, pursuant to a previous request by the contractor, the board of public works recommended to the board of supervisors the granting of the desired extension, and on January 21, 1924, three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Fanning v. SchammelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Kelso v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. J. W. Wright & Sons Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Gallagher v. J. W. Wright & Sons Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API