Legal Opinion
In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925
California Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11669PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The proceeding which is involved herein had for its purpose the obtaining of a judgment declaring valid certain bonds authorized to be issued at an election held pursuant to the provisions of a statute known as the Municipal Utility District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 245). Judgment was rendered in favor of the validity of the bonds, and…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Mines v. Del ValleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Dawson v. Town of Los Altos HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.