Legal Opinion
State v. Hodges
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1969PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
The defendant was convicted of violating ORS 167.210 (contributing to the delinquency of a minor), and appeals. His principal assignment of error asserts that the statute under which he was. indicted is unconstitutional.
The indictment, insofar as material, reads as follows :
“The above named RALPH PAUL HODGES is accused by the Lane County Grand Jury by this Indictment of the crime of CONTRIBUTING TO THE DELINQUENCY OP A MINOR committed as follows:
“The said RALPH PAUL HODGES on or about the 15th day of August, 1967, in the county aforesaid, did then and there in the presence and viéwof Debbie…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.