Legal Opinion

State v. Garcias

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1984No. A26238, A26286, A26387, A26285, A26283, A26284 SC 29504, A27666, A27924, A27979 SC 29844, A27262, A27263 SC 29843PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

In these consolidated cases, defendants challenge the constitutionality of the menacing statute, ORS 163.190(1), enacted in 1971. That statute provides:

“A person commits the crime of menacing if by word or conduct he intentionally attempts to place another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury.”

We believe the statute can best be understood in relation to the development of criminal assault in this state.

Prior to 1971, the assault statutes had remained substantively the same since their enactment in 1843. Compare General Laws of Oregon §§ 531-537 (Deady & Lane 1874) with ORS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. LilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API