Legal Opinion
Goewey v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 11, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:92-2543-22PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CURRIE, District Judge.
This is an alleged toxic tort case resulting from an infant’s accidental exposure to a roofing sealant substance. 1 Plaintiffs assert several claims against the United States of America (hereinafter “the USA”) under the Federal Tort Claims Act (hereinafter “FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. Jurisdiction for the FTCA claims is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). Plaintiffs also assert several claims against Fluor Daniel Corporation, and its associated company, FD Services, Incorporated, (collectively “FD”). Jurisdiction as to those claims is based on diversity of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marcum v. ZimmerDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Googerdy v. North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Plourde v. GladstoneDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- In Re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Contacts Lens Solution Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
- Disher v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.