Legal Opinion
Plourde v. Gladstone
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided March 20, 2002No. 1:00-cv-00194PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. ROBERT K. SIMON
(Paper 116)
MURTHA, Chief Judge.
Before the Court in this toxic tort action is a motion by Defendants Walter Gladstone, Craig W. Trischman, and Twin State Fertilizer, Inc. to exclude the expert opinion testimony of Dr. Robert K. Simon. For the reasons explained below, Defen dants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Dr. Simon’s proffered testimony on the issue of injury causation.
I. Background
From 1997 through 2001, Plaintiffs Daniel and Margaret Plourde lived with their two children, Andre and Daniele Plourde, on their…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Byers v. Lincoln Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.