Legal Opinion
In Re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Contacts Lens Solution Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 17, 2010No. MDL No. 1785. C/A No. 2:06-MN-77777-DCNPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
DAVID C. NORTON, Chief Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all claims and causes of action asserted by non -Fusarium plaintiffs. 2 With the exclusion of plaintiffs’ causation expert regarding eye infections other than Fusarium keratitis, it has become clear that the remaining plaintiffs have no admissible evidence to support their allegation that defendant’s Renu with MoistureLoc (“MoistureLoc”) contact lens solution caused the eye infections they experienced. Consequently, these plaintiffs cannot prove an essential…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisher v. PelstringDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG (PLR1)District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.