Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1912No. 17,215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The property in controversy consists of two lots in the city of Wichita. Plaintiff’s title rests upon a tax deed to The Hartford Western Land Company, dated November 28, 1896, recorded December 7, 1896, a quitclaim deed from the tax-title holder to The Anthony Investment Company, dated September 10, 1898, and a quitclaim deed from The Anthony Investment Company to plaintiff Penrose, dated October 2, 1901, which was recorded April 7, 1909. The plaintiff proved these conveyances and that possession was taken under the tax deed September 10,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Betts v. LetcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Penrose v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McBee v. O'ConnellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Penrose v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. McDonald v. Joint Rural High School District No. 9Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Stalcup v. StalcupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Feess v. Mechanics' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API