Williamson v. . Brown
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The referee's report is conclusive as to the facts. It states, in substance, that the plaintiff had sufficient information to put him upon inquiry as to the defendant's mortgage; but that after making all the inquiry, which upon such information it became his duty to make, he failed to discover that any such mortgage existed. This being, as I think, what the referee intended to state, is to be assumed as the true interpretation of his report.
The question in the case, therefore is, as to the nature and effect of that kind of notice so frequently mentioned as notice sufficient to put a party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tuttle v. Jackson ex dem. HillsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- Grimstone v. CarterNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Jackson ex dem. Merrick v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Jackson ex dem. Hyer v. Van ValkenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by176 opinions
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Farr v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Anderson v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.