Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1912No. 17,215PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

A rehearing was granted in this case and the only point reargued is this: Upon the facts found by the jury was it a question of law to be determined by the court, or one of fact for the j ury, whether the appellant exercised due diligence? The sixth paragraph of the syllabus of the former opinion reads:

“The plaintiff, who occupied the relation of a purchaser without actual knowledge of an unrecorded deed, inquired of the tenant and learned the name of the agent to whom the tenant paid rent. Relying upon his knowledge of the fact that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cook v. . TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Birdsall v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Koster v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Morris v. Kasparek (In Re Kasparek)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Froelich v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Maris v. Lawrence Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Marshall v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API